Comments on: Should art be good for you? http://greatbritishartdebate.tate.org.uk/should-art-be-good-for-you/ What does art mean to YOU? Wed, 15 May 2013 10:37:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: David Hughes http://greatbritishartdebate.tate.org.uk/should-art-be-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-88 David Hughes Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:04:36 +0000 http://www.y-m-e.co.uk/gbad/?p=90#comment-88 All art is good for you, anything that stimulates an emotion be it negative or positive has to be in some way good for you, art allows you to learn a little bit more about yourself than you knew before viewing the art. All art is good for you, anything that stimulates an emotion be it negative or positive has to be in some way good for you, art allows you to learn a little bit more about yourself than you knew before viewing the art.

]]>
By: kushla pope http://greatbritishartdebate.tate.org.uk/should-art-be-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-63 kushla pope Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:21:12 +0000 http://www.y-m-e.co.uk/gbad/?p=90#comment-63 i really don't like the word 'should' so i reject the question! i really don’t like the word ‘should’ so i reject the question!

]]>
By: Ian MacIntyre http://greatbritishartdebate.tate.org.uk/should-art-be-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-61 Ian MacIntyre Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:26:57 +0000 http://www.y-m-e.co.uk/gbad/?p=90#comment-61 If art doesn't have the style of an individual, it's not good. The way that VanGogh painted Gaugin's chair can be compared to the Keith Haring style; both are unique. If art doesn’t have the style of an individual, it’s not good.
The way that VanGogh painted Gaugin’s chair can be compared to the Keith Haring style; both are unique.

]]>
By: James Isherwood http://greatbritishartdebate.tate.org.uk/should-art-be-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-60 James Isherwood Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:56:37 +0000 http://www.y-m-e.co.uk/gbad/?p=90#comment-60 Art is good for for us in a sense of it being historical. It's good for us because it teaches us about a past...a time long gone but thanks to art never forgotton. Art is like what photographs are like to us today. How good does it feel when you see an artwork in the flesh after years seeing and reading about it. Just stood there inches from a masterpiece. Art is good because art is emotion,conflict,rumour and debate all at the same time. Art is good for for us in a sense of it being historical. It’s good for us because it teaches us about a past…a time long gone but thanks to art never forgotton. Art is like what photographs are like to us today. How good does it feel when you see an artwork in the flesh after years seeing and reading about it. Just stood there inches from a masterpiece. Art is good because art is emotion,conflict,rumour and debate all at the same time.

]]>
By: swan http://greatbritishartdebate.tate.org.uk/should-art-be-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-58 swan Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:04:54 +0000 http://www.y-m-e.co.uk/gbad/?p=90#comment-58 I thought art was truth ... truth through the muse, truth through the spirit and through the hand (or body). Can this be good for you - of course. Can it be bad - absolutely. I thought art was truth … truth through the muse, truth through the spirit and through the hand (or body). Can this be good for you – of course. Can it be bad – absolutely.

]]>