Two Hounds Chasing a Hare c.1700, attributed to James Hamilton

This painting is in oil paint on canvas, measuring 1105 x 1527 mm (fig.1). The support is composed of two pieces of plain woven linen canvas stitched together at a vertical join which passes through the eye of the hound on the left. The left-hand piece is 655mm wide and the right 918mm (fig.2). The join, which is rough but evenly stitched, seems to have been made using the same canvas threads as the painting support. The fabric of both sections is relatively coarse with threads of uneven thickness and distribution. The weave count of both sections is approximately the same, being 11 vertical and 12 or 13 horizontal threads per square centimetre.

The paintings’ original tacking edges have been removed except for a slender remnant about 10mm wide at the right turnover edge. There is some evidence of cusping along the bottom and right edges.1 The current stretcher appears to be contemporary with the lining, probably late nineteenth century. There is evidence for a previous stretcher or strainer in bar marks running across the top of the painting (29mm in from the canvas edge), on the left (45mm from the canvas edge), at the bottom (37mm from the canvas edge) and on the right (47mm from the canvas edge). There is also a cross bar mark, measuring approximately 35mm wide, running vertically down the middle of the painting. All of this suggests that little has been lost from the composition.

The bright red ground is composed of two layers, probably bound in oil (figs.3–4). The first coat consists of red ochre and associated silicaceous material, with additions of glass, black, yellow ochre and lead white.2 This layer is coarser than the second coat and fills the coarse weave. The second, much thinner ground layer is also predominantly red ochre with silicon-rich glassy particles but has a much higher content of black and some cologne earth. The artist probably exploited this brightly coloured ground in the composition, especially for the glazes in the shadows, but the level of wear makes this difficult to gauge.

Infrared reflectography suggested brushed underdrawing in black or brown paint (figs.5–6). The foliage and distant landscape appear to have been underpainted in opaque beige and grey paint, probably to give a cooler tone to the green leaves and blue, distant hills. No underpainting was detected elsewhere.

The painting has suffered a great deal of abrasion from overcleaning in the past. This is most apparent in the sky, on the join and in the shadows. Due to the high level of wear and two extensive campaigns of much later retouching, it is very difficult to assess the development and manner of execution of the composition. However, it is possible to say that clear reserves were left for all the principal compositional elements, as shown in the X-radiograph (fig.2). The animals were painted mostly wet-in-wet in a single layer with minor additions in low impasto and translucent glazes (figs.7–11). Most of the clouds go over the sky paint.

The palette includes verdigris, green earth, smalt, indigo, red ochre, vermilion, red lake, yellow ochre and cologne earth. Chalk, pipeclay and ground glass were also found in many of the colour mixtures to modify and extend the paint.

March 2020

Close